Strict (absolute) liability is imposed when:

Strict (absolute) liability is imposed when:

• A. An act or situation is inherently dangerous
• B. The plaintiff must prove negligence
• C. Liability requires proof of intent
• D. Liability applies only to professional activities

Answer: (A)

Strict liability applies when the act or situation itself is so inherently dangerous that liability attaches regardless of fault or negligence. In these cases, the plaintiff doesn’t have to prove the defendant was careless; the risk is so great that responsibility rests on the party controlling the activity or condition. Classic examples include blasting or storing large quantities of explosives, or other abnormally dangerous activities. The other options require proving negligence, intent, or apply to professional fault standards, which is why they don’t fit strict liability.

Strict liability applies when the act or situation itself is so inherently dangerous that liability attaches regardless of fault or negligence. In these cases, the plaintiff doesn’t have to prove the defendant was careless; the risk is so great that responsibility rests on the party controlling the activity or condition. Classic examples include blasting or storing large quantities of explosives, or other abnormally dangerous activities. The other options require proving negligence, intent, or apply to professional fault standards, which is why they don’t fit strict liability.